Cited by 56Radiation Therapy and DosimetryRadiation Dose and ImagingSpaceflight effects on biology

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Effective Dose Equivalent on the Ninth Shuttle–Mir Mission (STS-91)

Abstract

Organ and tissue doses and effective dose equivalent were measured using a life-size human phantom on the ninth Shuttle-Mir Mission (STS-91, June 1998), a 9.8-day spaceflight at low-Earth orbit (about 400 km in altitude and 51.65 degrees in inclination). The doses were measured at 59 positions using a combination of thermoluminescent dosimeters of Mg(2)SiO(4):Tb (TDMS) and plastic nuclear track detectors (PNTD). In correcting the change in efficiency of the TDMS, it was assumed that reduction of efficiency is attributed predominantly to HZE particles with energy greater than 100 MeV nucleon(-1). A conservative calibration curve was chosen for determining LET from the PNTD track-formation sensitivities. The organ and tissue absorbed doses during the mission ranged from 1.7 to 2.7 mGy and varied by a factor of 1.6. The dose equivalent ranged from 3.4 to 5.2 mSv and varied by a factor of 1.5 on the basis of the dependence of Q on LET in the 1990 recommendations of the ICRP. The effective quality factor (Q(e)) varied from 1.7 to 2.4. The dose equivalents for several radiation-sensitive organs, such as the stomach, lung, gonad and breast, were not significantly different from the skin dose equivalent (H(skin)). The effective dose equivalent was evaluated as 4.1 mSv, which was about 90% of the H(skin).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1667/0033-7587(2000)154[0705:edeotn]2.0.co;2

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. 10.1016/1359-0189(92)90084-9 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/0273-1177(94)90495-2 · DOI
  3. W. Hoffman, and B. Prediger .Heavy particle dosimetry with high temperature peaks of CaF 2 :Tm and 7 LiF phosphors., Radiat. Prot. Dosim, 6 :149 –152 .1984 . · DOI
  4. N. Vana, W. Schoner, M. Fugger, and Y. Akatov .Absorbed dose measurement and LET determination with TLDs in space., Radiat. Prot. Dosim, 66 :145 –152 .1996 . · DOI
  5. O. B. Geiß, M. Krämer, and G. Kraft .Efficiency of thermoluminescent detectors to heavy charged particles., Nucl. Instrum. Methods, B142 :592 –598 .1998 . · DOI
  6. 10.1088/0022-3727/32/10/315 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/1350-4487(94)00084-E · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S1350-4487(96)00095-9 · DOI
  9. 10.2187/bss.11.355 · DOI
  10. 10.2307/3578867 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/0969-8078(93)90167-3 · DOI
  12. 10.1146/annurev.ns.33.120183.001543 · DOI · Paper page
  13. H. Yasuda, and K. Fujitaka .Responses of TLD-Mg 2 SiO 4 :Tb and radiophoto-luminescent glass to heavy charged particles and space radiation., Radiat. Prot. Dosim, 87 :115 –120 .2000 . · DOI
  14. 10.1016/0020-708X(82)90237-X · DOI
  15. 10.1088/0022-3727/21/5/022 · DOI
  16. P. Olko, P. Bilski, and V. M. Michalik .Microdosimetric analysis of the response of LiF thermoluminescent detectors for radiations of different qualities., Radiat. Prot. Dosim, 52 :405 –408 .1994 . · DOI
  17. O. B. Geiß, M. Krämer, and G. Kraft .Verification of heavy ion dose distributions using thermoluminescent detectors., Nucl. Instrum. Methods, B148 :541 –544 .1998 . · DOI
  18. 10.1016/S1350-4487(97)00118-2 · DOI
  19. H. Yasuda, Incident-angle dependency found in track formation sensitivity of a plastic nuclear track detector (TD-1)., J. Health Phys, 34 :387 –190 .1999 . · DOI
  20. 10.1016/1350-4487(95)00291-X · DOI
  21. 10.2307/3578496 · DOI
  22. 10.1016/1359-0189(92)90082-7 · DOI
  23. 10.2307/3577902 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/0273-1177(96)00034-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 56

Metadata

Authors
Yasuda, H., Badhwar, G. D., Komiyama, T., & Fujitaka, K.
Affiliations
  • Johnson Space Center (US)
  • Japan Aerospace Exploration Agency (JP)
  • National Institute of Radiological Sciences (JP)
Corresponding author
Yasuda, Hiroshi
Venue
Radiation Research
Published
2000-12
Volume
154
Issue
6
Pages
705-713
ISSN
  • 0033-7587 (ISSN-L)
  • 1938-5404
OpenAlex
W2205206171
Cited by
56
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Radiation Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BioOne Complete (BioOne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Radiation Therapy and Dosimetry
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiation Dose and Imaging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Spaceflight effects on biology
Keywords
effective dose equivalent, STS-91, space radiation, low Earth orbit, HZE particles, LET, quality factor, thermoluminescent dosimeters, plastic nuclear track detectors, human phantom, radiation protection
MeSH terms
Calibration, Cosmic Radiation, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Organ Specificity, Radiation Dosage, Radiation Monitoring, Space Flight, Phantoms, Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review